台灣原始佛教協會

1.幾年前,一位師兄曾在短暫的交談時,說到:唯識由安慧的認識論(較不背離原始佛教)而後轉成護法的存有論,其實佛陀很少談到存有論的[我]的

2.The question of inherent existence really doesn’t have much to with why we attach to things~2006-05-01_ThanissaroBikkhu_EmptinessRevisited (剛開始大約一分鐘1:20)

http://www.audiodharma.org/talks/audio_player/879.html

註:因為都是聽來的,當然有可能記錯.寫錯.曲解.甚至斷章取義的疑慮,..目的是提供給有興趣的法友參考,並且留意相關的資料,例如這裡 modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=16504

leeyc2 寫:.The question of inherent existence really doesn’t have much to with why we attach to things~

The question of inherent existence really doesn’t have much to do with why we're attached to things

leeyc2 寫:

leeyc2 寫:.The question of inherent existence really doesn’t have much to with why we attach to things~

The question of inherent existence really doesn’t have much to do with why we're attached to things

這樣說其實是有一點問題的。

我個人理解經典當中其實是在反復強調，並沒有一個inherent existence。

佛說,色等是不是無常?是無常，就是在否定inherent existence。